Accessibility links

Case study

Promoting Induction Cooking in Ecuador

Language
English
Countries and regions
Ecuador, Latin America and Caribbean
Action area

Adaptation, Mitigation, Cross-cutting

Case summary

Since 2007, Ecuador has been working on strategies to improve energy efficiency, mainly in the residential sector. In 2014, Ecuador started implementing the Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Substitution Programme (PEC) 1 that contains, as a central component, the introduction of induction cookers across the country.

The PEC is closely aligned with Ecuador’s development plans and objectives, aiming at reducing its dependence on imported and subsidised fuels, and increasing the share of renewable energy in the matrix. As such, it forms part of a comprehensive and coherent package of fiscal, development and energy policies that combine long-term planning for hydropower with a strategy to phase out LPG subsidies, and the elaboration of market based mechanisms to promote private investment. The GHG mitigation potential of the programme has led Ecuador to consider it as a NAMA.

Main features of the PEC include high level political commitment that supports the initiative in a holistic and integrated manner as well as strong involvement of key ministries across all sectors. The elaboration of a sound, multi-criteria socio-economic analysis and an effective communications strategy were also central factors for the success of this programme.

Planning and implementation activity
Developing Strategies and Plans, Linking with the Sustainable Development Goals
Institutions involved
  • Ministry of Electricity and Renewable Energy, promoting and leading the PEC.
  • Ministry of Industry and Productivity, for the activities related to the production and commercialisation of locally-produced induction stoves.
  • Ministry of Environment, for the technical component of the PEC in terms of GHG mitigation and climate change.
  • Ministry of Hydrocarbons for issues related to LPG consumption.
Sectors and themes
Agriculture
Source details
Global Good Practice Analysis (GIZ UNDP)

Results supported byUNDPWorld Resources InstituteTransparency partnership